Ron Paul, even though he represents the State of Texas, and may or may not agree with the fact that the lawful status of Texas is that of an independent nation. He does, however, appear to agree with us regarding the unlawful actions of the U.S. "Government", starting with its President. I personally find it truly refreshing to know that we aren't the only ones who have discovered this truth.

The following is an article written by Ron Paul on this subject and I personally applaud him for his insight, honesty, and courage to speak the truth.

Jesse Enloe, President
Republic of Texas Provisional Government


October 26, 1999

Presidential Power Grab
by U.S. Representative Ron Paul (Texas)

Do you want our military to be moved under the United Nations' command without congressional approval? Do you know that a change in policy now requires our military to absorb a nuclear first strike and only retaliate afterward? Representative Jack Metcalf served in the U.S. Army, and I was an Air Force flight surgeon, and as members of the U.S. House of Representatives we think these are terrible policies.

Unfortunately, Presidential Decision Directive 25 (PDD 25) takes the matter of U.S. troops in U.N. operations completely out of the hands of Congress. And PDD 60 replaces the proven deterrence of our launch-on-warning policy with a new policy requiring the U.S. military to take a hit the Pentagon brass will probably know is coming, retaliating afterward. PDD 25 and PDD 60 are classified and the exact texts have not been made available even when requested by members of Congress, but from the "summary" of each PDD we have been allowed to see and sources familiar with the actual documents, that is what they appear to say.

And we don't want the White House to implement international treaties that are bad for America. By law, the president must submit international agreements to the U.S. Senate for advice and consent, and two thirds of the senators must concur. Some treaties, like the so-called "treaty on global warming," are so costly and unfair to Americans that President Clinton is actually afraid to submit them to the U.S. Senate out of fear the senators won't go along.

In fact, President Clinton wrote Executive Order 13107 (EO 13107) so he could implement such treaties on his own, and we don't like that either. It certainly is unconstitutional.

Something is awfully wrong with these executive orders (PDDs are really just a fancy category of EO's). True, executive orders have a place in running the routine business of the executive branch and seeing that laws passed by Congress are duly executed. It is a president's expansion of that limited authority in order to do things he could never get accomplished through the legitimate legislative process that has given us the crises we see today. Today, if President Clinton wants a law he knows the peoples' duly-elected representatives won't pass, all he does is write an EO or PDD and it "becomes law." Isn't that what an old-fashioned king would do? ignore the constitutional limits on his authority and rule by edict?

Some of us have had enough. That's why Jack Metcalf and I recently introduced H.R. 2655 in the U.S. House of Representatives. We call the bill The Separation of Powers Restoration Act, and if it passes, it will stop this president and future presidents from trying to run our country as though they had been elected king.

It's a mistake, though, to place all the blame for this abuse of power on any single president. Congress and the courts have stood by while the misuse of executive orders has grown to gigantic proportions. That's why succeeding presidents have been tempted to see how much more they can get away with, until there are now over 13,000 executive orders on the books! Congress just isn't paying attention.

When Congress is asleep at the switch, it's up to the public to send them a wake-up call. In order for Representative Metcalf and I to get our legislation brought to the floor of the House for debate, we are asking every citizen who shares our concern to contact their own representative and ask him or her to become a co-sponsor. Thanks to the Internet, that's a lot easier than it used to be. Just go to www.ExecutiveOrders.org and follow the simple instructions to see if your congressman is already a co-sponsor of H.R. 2655, and if not, press a button to tell them to get on board. If you don't have Internet access at home or at the office, try your local library.

What the president is doing with these EO's and PDDs is just un-American, there's no other way to put it. A chief complaint American colonists made against King George before the Revolutionary War was that he took powers that were not rightfully his, and then as king, used those powers to the disadvantage of the people. How is that different from what the president is doing now? If you go to www.ExecutiveOrders.org and find your representative is not a co-sponsor of H.R. 2655, will you ask him that question?

It's time to send Congress a wake-up call!

 Ron Paul, M.D., is a member of [U.S.] Congress from Texas.  [emphasis added]